FSA Lost Appeal Against UBS Bankers in United Kingdom
In a rare successful appeal against a fine imposed by the regulator, John Pottage was cleared of misconduct by Britain's Upper Tribunal over compliance failings that occurred under his supervision at UBS's British wealth management business, which he ran. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) had sought to fine him 100,000 pounds ($161,000) for alleged failings as the unit's boss, even though he was not personally involved in the compliance issues.
The Upper Tribunal said that they think that the actions that Mr. Pottage in fact took prior to July 2007 to deal with the operational and compliance issues as they arose were reasonable steps. The bank itself was fined in relation to the control weaknesses at the wealth management division, and has said the failings were remediated by June 2009. The firm was an interested party in the Pottage case, not a defendant. Pottage has had the backing of UBS throughout the case and is still an employee of the firm in Switzerland.
With this judgment, the national financial watchdog has lost a key test of its powers to punish bankers for alleged supervision failures when a fine on a senior UBS banker was overturned by a court. On this, the FSA said that it accepted the decision, but was undeterred from pursuing disciplinary action against senior management. Tracey McDermott, acting director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA said that they have always recognized that pursuing disciplinary action against senior management in large firms is very challenging. However, they also strongly believe that senior management must take responsibility for the businesses they run. UBS itself is still embroiled in a separate investigation after a rogue trader caused a $2.3 billion loss last year. The results of that probe are still not known. Although wins against the FSA are rare, other senior bankers are following this route. In early April, prominent JP Morgan dealmaker Ian Hannam was fined 450,000 pounds for market abuse, a punishment he is appealing. Apply with www.paydaybox.co.uk and avail a quick financial aid.
The Tax and Chancery Chamber of the Upper Tribunal, which has a financial services segment, is the standard port of call for appealing FSA decisions. Before the Pottage case, the FSA had only lost twice. The Upper Tribunal has had a former FSA official among its judges - Tim Herrington, former chairman of the regulatory decisions committee (RDC), which oversees verdicts on disciplinary action, from this year.
Look Right - About Author:
Luke Right is an expert financial expert and he gives his special opinion on quick payday. doorstep loans ,same day doorstep loans, door to door loans and www.paydaytext.co.uk
Published by Lewis Jasvin on July 20th 2012 | Loans
Published by Gorgie Nork on May 18th 2012 | Loans
Published by Caron Young on June 2nd 2012 | Loans
Published by Adam Felix on December 7th 2011 | Loans
Published by Ponting Sarad on May 10th 2012 | Loans
Published by Thoms Stuart on January 12th 2012 | Loans
Published by Alesia Ace on June 30th 2012 | Loans
Published by Albert Bells on June 13th 2012 | Loans
Published by Smith Eldwin on July 16th 2012 | Loans
Published by Morgan Sadyu on May 4th 2012 | Loans
Published by Milos Pesic on February 27th 2012 | Loans
Published by Vilson Louise on May 30th 2012 | Loans
Published by Jack Clemen on December 26th 2011 | Loans
Published by Rex Moshe on April 9th 2012 | Loans
Published by Micles Jonson on March 30th 2012 | Loans
Published by Ricky Loyel on June 14th 2012 | Loans
Published by Galvin Colton on June 7th 2012 | Loans
Published by Ross Sorin on March 13th 2012 | Finance
Published by Ross Futher on April 6th 2012 | Loans
Published by Aldis Roy on June 16th 2012 | Loans