The Dynamics of Accreditation and Quality Assurance
One of the things most companies seek to improve their image is accreditation. Although it is not required to all types of business, it has been considered as a norm that must be followed by larger institutions such as schools, healthcare units, and other establishments such as museums. Take note that accreditation is not as simple as a one-time opportunity and may not even be achieved overnight. Accreditation is a process that needs a process-driven approach called quality assurance.
Quality assurance involves specific steps that will help an organization achieve their goals. These steps depend on the nature of the organization and the type of accreditation that needs to be achieved. In most cases, an organization can use a tool such as the Stewart Cycle that involves four general steps: plan, do, check, and act.
The very first step in determining quality assurance is planning, which involves establishment of objectives and goals. Organizations don’t just literally check their products and services right away. Before they execute any quality assurance step, they have to consider factors such as closer observation of the materials used in production and develop a process required to deliver the desired result.
This is the execution of everything that was planned or simply process implementation. In most cases, this step involves distribution of instructions that must be carried out for a certain period. Some organizations may interpret this step as experimentation that allows them to control variables, others consider it as an actual, real time step.
When it comes to Accreditation and Quality Assurance, checking seems to be a universal step. It involves gathering information from employees, soliciting suggestions from stake holders, and collecting clientele feedback to measure performance. Some of the quality performance measures include number of customer complaints, time to identify and solve problems, number of audits performed, cost of repairs, number of manufacturing interruptions, and others. Through checking, the business will determine if customer needs are being satisfied by the products or services that they offer.
If errors were found during checking, acting could mean revision in the process. In Accreditation and Quality Assurance, acting entails deciding what must be done the next time the company designs a new product, attend a meeting, offers a new service, and others. If the experiment yields desirable results, this step may also involve implementation on a larger scale.
Accreditation and Quality Assurance are two dynamic aspects when it comes to product and service excellence in various types of industries. Quality assurance may be observed even without accreditation. However, without quality assurance, accreditation is less likely to be achieved by an organization.
Published by Mary Porter on July 6th 2012 | Business
Published by James Blee on August 23rd 2012 | Business
Published by James Blee on July 25th 2012 | Business
Published by Tooba on December 7th 2011 | Business
Published by Albert Kharker on January 23rd 2012 | Business
Published by James on February 22nd 2012 | Business
Published by Christy Jackson on May 28th 2012 | Business
Published by Jamessms on January 31st 2012 | Business
Published by Mary Porter on July 20th 2012 | Business
Published by James Blee on June 19th 2012 | Business
Published by Julia Roger on January 11th 2012 | Business
Published by on July 18th 2012 | Business
Published by Fashionstudio1 on January 6th 2012 | Business
Published by Batulahan on January 8th 2012 | Business
Published by Mary Porter on June 15th 2012 | Business
Published by Chaircoverdepot on June 21st 2012 | Business
Published by on July 2nd 2012 | Business
Published by Jorge Keely on December 31st 2011 | Business
Published by Paul Pepe on August 13th 2012 | Business
Published by Miketysonwillson on December 15th 2011 | Business